The Boston Herald

Alimony reform: pending legislation suggest that changes may be ahead

By Charla Bizios Stevens and Erin Harris  / Law   |   Monday, March 1, 2010 

With competing bills pending before the House and Senate, alimony reform may be on the horizon in Massachusetts.

For decades, alimony laws in the Commonwealth have remained unchanged, with lifetime alimony awards being favored and high standards for modification of an existing award.

Both bills share the goal of bringing Massachusetts more in line with the national trend towards durational or rehabilitative awards, as is common in neighboring New Hampshire and Maine. In states such as New Hampshire, where alimony is considered rehabilitative, courts look at many factors in deciding on the amount and duration of alimony.

One such factor may be whether the recipient is in need of income supplementation to allow him or her to obtain additional education or training to return to the work force after a delay caused by homemaking and childrearing. More...

Role adjustments

Couples adapt as women become bigger breadwinners
By Taryn Plumb, Globe Correspondent  |  February 18, 2010

"It’s no revelation that women have smashed the stereotypes embodied by Harriet Nelson and June Cleaver. New research is showing that women are not only contributing more to the household bottom line - they are increasingly the larger, sometimes even the sole, breadwinner. And for the first time in US history, women are about to outnumber men in the workforce - and, according to some projections, within two decades women will outnumber men as the home’s major breadwinner."

"Just as women entering the workforce required a big adjustment in the attitudes that for generations defined marriages, another big adjustment is needed now with wives earning more on average than their husbands. If it was dying before, the idea of families having a “traditional breadwinner’’ seems officially dead."

"A recent study by the University of New Hampshire’s Carsey Institute found that wives’ earnings comprised 45 percent of the total family income in 2008. That marked a 1 percent increase from 2007 and was up from 42 percent in 1999. Kristin Smith, the study’s author, said the latest increase is more significant than it sounds: It represents the biggest single-year increase in 10 years." More...

As Women Earn More, Alimony Laws Lag Behind

February 2, 2010
The Wall Street Journal, The Juggle Section, By Rachel Emma Silverman

As we recently wrote, women now make up almost half of the American work force and a growing number of women are becoming their families’ primary breadwinners.

But while the economics of marriage have undergone major transformations, the economics of divorce haven’t kept up. As my WSJ colleague Jennifer Levitz reports, there is a growing movement, spurred by the recession, to change how alimony is paid.

Alimony, or spousal-support payments, typically involves a husband supporting his ex-wife long after the demise of the marriage. (Alimony is separate from child-support payments.) Men accounted for 97% of alimony-payers in 2008, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, although the share of women supporting ex-husbands is on the rise. More...

Massachusetts proposes changes to alimony laws

By Jill Boynton, co-founder of Cornerstone Financial Planning
December 18, 2009

"The fact that the amount and term of alimony (while taking into account the length of marriage and earnings of both parties) are at the discretion of the court gives the judge too much flexibility. In addition, with the ability of women to work and earn their own living, rules that were created in a different era don't apply anymore. I once heard a mediator in a divorce case remind a spouse that "divorce is not a pension plan" and that she shouldn't expect to be taken care of for the rest of her life. I think that is a fair and equitable way to look at the situation. Of course there will always be situations when lifetime alimony may be necessary and the bill won't deny those parties their due. But remember that the purpose of alimony is to support the lesser-earning spouse while he or she does what is necessary to become self-sufficient. More...

It may be time to get rid of alimony

November 30, 10:12 AM Bruce Maiman

"I defy any lawyer to give me an interpretation of the line in quotes in this story in the Wall Street Journal [referring to the alimony court case of Paul and Theresa Taylor] that the two parties agreed to "waive any right to past, present or future alimony."

If you're a lawyer or a linguist or an English professor, can you explain to me where the wiggle room is in that statement? The two parties agreed to "waive any right to past, present or future alimony."

How can that mean anything but, "You don't have a case, Mrs. Taylor," and yet the court awarded this woman a $400 a week alimony payment out of this man's pension.

How in Heaven's name can that be seen as justice or fair?

Is that what has become of a marriage and its dissolution? No matter what agreement we sign, unless we have an iron clad pre-nup we're forever at risk from people who can't keep their word, even by dint of a legal document? Is there even a legal document that can absolutely protect you in a situation like this?" More...

BOSTON HERALD

Girl/Boy friend's Income and Assets Subject to Alimony For First Wife

By Gerald Nissenbaum  / Divorce 411
Sunday, November 29, 2009

Q. Your Oct. 4 column said that an ex-husband could subpoena the financial records of a woman’s live-in boyfriend. How can that be? They don’t have any legal relationship and he’s probably not on the lease or mortgage. He can move out at any time. To me your advice seems wrong.
- N.G., Ashfield

A. Trust me, I’m not wrong. If you’re living with a woman and your ex-wife seeks more alimony or child support - or if you’re looking to cut down your payments - your girlfriend’s records can be subpoenaed into court.

For example, if your galpal is paying some of your expenses, that increases your ability to pay alimony and child support. So the judge may order you to pony up more. If you’re paying more money for your lady friend’s expenses than your alimony and child support, the judge also could find you can afford to pay more. More...

BOSTON HERALD

Alimony payer critical of Mass.

By Gerald Nissenbaum  / Divorce 411
Sunday, November 22, 2009

Q. I’ve heard there’s a chance Massachusetts might change its alimony laws to give judges the power to order payments only for a limited number of years, perhaps with a mandatory cutoff at one-half of the total number of years the marriage lasted.
If this new law gets passed, will it apply to existing alimony orders like mine?
- T.M., Boxford

A. When issuing an order of alimony, Massachusetts judges have no authority to limit the number of years payments must be made.

Many people think the current law is unfair and out of touch with the real world. Some point to Maine, which permits limited support. There, for spouses who want traditional alimony, they probably won’t get anything if the marriage lasted less than 10 years. If they stayed hitched for 10 to 20 years, they will likely get alimony for only half the years they were married. More...

Hill: Lost faith in Rep. Peisch

Nov-18-2009
"...This past week, Rep. Peisch was interviewed on Fox-TV on the alimony reform bill. She supports Sen. Cynthia Creem's, D-Newton, watered-down alimony reform bill, rather than the bill that would make real and fair change. What a surprise. Sen. Creem shares a district with Rep. Peisch. Sen. Creem, who co-chairs the Judiciary Committee, is an actively practicing divorce lawyer. Can you say conflicts of interest?

Both Sen. Creem and Rep. Peisch know that Sen. Creem's bill would guarantee more litigation, thus more monies for divorce lawyers, not less.
In 2008, the Supreme Judicial Court provided a report on why more and more people are going pro se (represent themselves), even middle class persons. They said it was because more and more people could not afford the astronomical legal fees.

Passing alimony reform and shared parenting would reduce fees to lawyers.
So who can be surprised when Rep. Peisch supports the status quo? It is time we start thinking about a new legislator for our district who puts the needs of the people first." More...

DR. PETER HILL,
Weston

Divorce Reform In Massachusetts: David vs. Goliath

By Tom Matlock, Co-founder of The Good Men Project
Nov-17-2009

If you have had the misfortune to go through a divorce in Massachusetts, you would understand that complete "Judicial Discretion" (what the BBA is promoting) is what causes parting spouses to fight endlessly in drawn out legal battles. When there are no guidelines and Judges have complete discretion, divorcing spouses have little basis for understanding what is fair and what is not. Thus, with the encouragement of divorce attorneys (always willing to rack up billable hours) couples fight endlessly over everything, especially alimony. This acrimony ruins relations between parting spouses, ruins the chance for a stable post-divorce environment for the children and drains the family coffers. More...

Alimony agony

By Adrian Walker
Globe Columnist / November 13, 2009

"Massachusetts divorce law gives trial judges broad discretion over both the amount and duration of support. The people - mostly divorce lawyers - who like the system the way it is say judges have the right to protect women who need and deserve it. The system’s many critics, meanwhile, say it creates an overly subjective and unpredictable maze that makes it difficult to ever completely sever ties with former spouses.

There are at least two major issues. In Massachusetts, unlike most other states, alimony is usually forever. And in Massachusetts, if a divorced person remarries, the income and assets of the new spouse can be used in determining how much alimony gets paid. Advocates scream, persuasively, that both provisions are unfair." More...

In Downturn's Wake, Women Hold Half of U.S. Jobs

November 11, 2009 by Kelly Evans

• As of September, women held 49.9% of the nation's jobs, excluding farm workers and the self-employed, a rise of 1.2 percentage points from their 48.7% share when the recession began in December 2007. In 1970, women held 35% of jobs.

• There is evidence that women's growing representation in the labor force stems not only from men losing their jobs but from women who previously didn't work seeking employment. Since the recession began, the number of women age 16 and over in the labor force -- which includes both the employed and those who are looking for work -- has expanded by 300,000 to 71.7 million.

• Women are either the sole earner or make as much as or more than their male spouses in four out of 10 [40%] U.S. families with children under 18, said Heather Boushey, a senior economist with the Center for American Progress, a liberal Washington think tank. More...

Retirees Still Liable for Alimony, Massachusetts Court Rules

By ABBY GOODNOUGH
Published: November 9, 2009

BOSTON — The highest court in Massachusetts ruled Monday that alimony should not automatically end when the paying spouse reaches retirement age and stops earning income.

The ruling by the state’s Supreme Judicial Court comes at a time when some alimony payers and state lawmakers are pushing for changes to the state’s alimony laws, which they call overly harsh on higher-earning spouses. Those advocating the changes had hoped the court would effectively end lifetime alimony. More...

Top Court in Massachusetts Rejects Argument for New Curbs on Alimony

November 9, 2009
By William M. Buckley

The top court in Massachusetts ruled against a retiree who sought to end payments to his ex-wife, dealing a blow to a movement that is seeking time limits for alimony....

The top court ruled that judges can consider diminished financial ability to pay after retirement as they can in other changed circumstances. But the court declined to rule that judges should automatically accept retirement as a reason to cut alimony. More...

SJC: Retirement does not necessarily end alimony payments

November 9, 2009
By Andrew Ryan and Shelley Murphy,
Globe Staff

In Massachusetts, marriage really still does mean until death do you part -- even after divorce.

The Supreme Judicial Court today rejected a push to stop most alimony payments when someone reaches retirement age. The decision, which came in the divorce case of a former federal magistrate and state judge, noted that alimony payments can be lowered or, in some cases, cut off to reflect a person's actual income after retirement.

However, Associate Justice Ralph D. Gants wrote in the decision that a spouse paying alimony "may be expected temporarily to postpone retirement or to find part-time work to help the recipient spouse weather difficult financial circumstances." More...

Wife No. 2 Paying for Wife No. 1? Join the Club

By ALICE GOMSTYN, ABC NEWS Business Unit
Nov. 6, 2009

Massachusetts' 2nd Wives Club Lobbies to Change Rules on Alimony Payments

Stress over alimony payments to her husband's ex-wife nearly drove Deborah Scanlan to divorce. Helping her husband make alimony payments to his ex forced Jeanie Hitner to take on a second job. Both Massachusetts women now say they wish they'd never gotten married. Welcome to the 2nd Wives Club. The club, which claims 70 members and counting, consists mostly of married women who say that Massachusetts judges' rulings forced them to contribute to alimony payments for their partners' ex-wives.... Full Story

The New Art of Alimony

By Jennifer Levitz, 10/31/2009

"The nature of marriage has changed dramatically over the decades. Women now make up almost half of the American work force. But alimony, a concept enshrined in ancient law, has remained remarkably constant. Now, the idea that a husband should continue to support his wife forever, even after the demise of their marriage—long a bedrock of divorce law—is being called into question. Pressures are mounting to change a practice that some see as outdated and unfair." More...

Update sought for alimony criteria in Massachusetts

By David Riley/Daily News staff
Nov-01-09

"Modern marriage is not always a "'til death do us part" affair, but in Massachusetts, alimony can last a lifetime.
Many local legislators and family law attorneys agree time has come to update the state's alimony system, which they say allows judges little leeway to set a limit on the duration of spousal support payments.
"It really is not fair the way the statute is drafted now," said attorney Patrick Hart, of Hart Law Offices in Marlborough." More...

Lifetime alimony payments are archaic

The Lowell Sun Editorial
Updated: Oct-26-2009

Why, in the year 2009, do Massachusetts' alimony laws still read as if it were 1900? Why, when many women earn salaries just as high as men, does the Bay State have laws that make it seem as though women are incapable of supporting themselves?

The alimony laws in Massachusetts can trap many residents in a financial life sentence in which they must provide support to a former spouse, who quite often is perfectly capable of paying his or her own bills. (Approximately 96 percent of Massachusetts alimony recipients are women.) ... (More)

A bill proposed by state Rep. Steven M. Walsh, D-Lynn, could change that lifetime burden to a more manageable, and equitable, responsibility... (More) [see Alimony Reform Bill 1785]

Thanks to Massachusetts' archaic alimony laws, which are considerably less progressive than any other state, far too many former spouses are granted hefty alimony payments when they could easily support themselves. But why would they? It's a lot easier to deposit a check than to actually earn the money.

Unfair alimony awards also damage second marriages. The income of a second spouse is factored into adjusted alimony awards, which can cause stress in second marriages and prompts some people to live together instead of marrying.

If Massachusetts wants to maintain its reputation as a progressive state with a cerebral population, it must reform its antiquated alimony laws.

See the Entire Editorial at LowellSun.com

Bill could shorten alimony time

By Lisa Redmond, lredmond@lowellsun.com
Updated: Oct-23-2009


BOSTON -- Alimony. It used to be a lifetime sentence.
But under a new bill proposed by state Rep. Steven M. Walsh, D-Lynn, the financial chains of alimony can be unlocked after a maximum of 12 years unless there are minor children involved.

Under House bill 1785, Walsh writes that the goal of any spouse needing alimony shall be to be self-supporting within a "reasonable period of time.'' More...

Equality: More men getting spousal support
By McCLATCHY-TRIBUNE

October 19, 2009

It’s not rare anymore. In fact, in the last 30 years, more and more women who end their marriages are stuck paying support to their ex-spouses - also known as ‘‘manimony.’’

‘‘When I started practicing 30 years ago, I didn’t see it at all. Zero. And now I see it in about 10 percent of my cases: female clients having to pay their ex-husbands support,’’ said Lynne Gold-Bikin, 65, family law chair at WolfBlock LLP based in Morristown, Penn. ‘‘Part of the reason is the simple fact that over that period of time, more women are making more money." More...

Role Reversal: Ex-Wives Angry Over Paying Alimony

Sep-30-2009

He got their second house, an investment property she had bought in Costa Rica, and a $96,000 annual alimony payment.

She got angry.

"It's so obscene," said Holly Chiancola, 52, a Gloucester, Mass. real estate agent who is fighting the terms of a divorce settlement ordered by a judge in 2006.

You used to hear about divorced men complaining that their ex-wives were unfairly cutting into their income. Now, as more women become primary breadwinners, the complaints increasingly come from them. The number of American men receiving alimony has climbed, from 7,000 in 1998 to 13,000 last year, according to U.S. Census Bureau data.

More...

Bar association wades into divorce law spat

Friday, September 25, 2009 Boston Business Journal - by Lisa van der Pool

"The current law – which does not allow judges to cap the duration of an alimony award, enabling post-divorce payments that last a lifetime – has drawn fierce criticism for decades."

Pierce v. Pierce
Ending Alimony At Retirement

September 8, 2009.

The MA Supreme Judicial Court heard Briefs on whether an alimony payer may retire and end alimony payments (see Rudolph Pierce Brief; Listen to Oral Arguments; Read American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers support for retirement and alimony termination.)

Boston Magazine:
Till Death Do Us Pay

By Kris Frieswick, Jun-30-2009

"The poster child for progressive marriage laws, Massachusetts is also a singularly nightmarish place to get a divorce—especially for the better-off spouse. Now a brewing reform movement is pushing to rewrite the state's outdated alimony rules, led by one very fed-up ex-husband."

"That makes the state's alimony system one that not only punishes some men, but also takes a dim view of the women it's supposed to help, enshrining biases that treat them as if it's the 1950s and women are uneducated, unemployable traditional mother/homemakers who shouldn't be stripped of the lifestyle to which they've grown accustomed. Actually, Ira Mark Ellman, a professor at Arizona State University's law school and author of the American Law Institute's recommendations on family law and alimony, would go further than that, having looked at our setup. "It's like a leftover from the old gender-based laws, 'women can't work, we can't put that obligation on them,'" he says. "It's right out of 1850.""

To download the full article, Till Death Do Us Pay

Should Permanent Alimony Be Eliminated?

Download the Report (See page 12 of the Winter 2009 edition of The Reformer*); Winter 2009

A report by Barbara von Hauzen, Esq. evaluates alimony in Massachusetts and recommends changes, which are consistent with Mass Alimony Reform's new law.

"The continuance of a permanent, unrevised alimony award perpetuates unfairness on the obligor. This stifles the obligor’s ability to financially reposition him or herself or may shutout other relational or vocational opportunities. In essence, the award becomes a permanent penalty to the payor and a windfall to the payee. Although we recognize that alimony is a civil matter, it is fair to say that the permanency of today’s alimony award results in incarceration with no chance of parole."

"And so, in Massachusetts, the question remains unanswered: “if marriage is terminable at will, and marital support obligations end upon
divorce, what is the justification for imposing continued financial responsibilities upon the parties?” Now is the time for the Massachusetts legislature and courts to answer this question."

Divorce Arianna-Style (c. 2009) vs. Massachusetts Alimony (c. 1850)

By Elizabeth Benedict and Tom Matlack; Jul-09-2009

"When a couple divorces - in a no-fault divorce - a judge typically awards hefty alimony with no end date, even to spouses who are educated, employed, highly accomplished - and even those who have received millions in marital assets or inheritance. Judges who put an expiration date on alimony are often overturned on appeal. With ongoing alimony, a divorced couple must return repeatedly to probate court whenever their circumstances change - illness, job loss, retirement - and petition for a modification up or down."

Rising Unemployment Creating More Work for Divorce Lawyers

PRNewswire; Mar-31-2009

Big Spike in Child Support and Alimony Modifications According to Latest Survey of Nation's Top Attorneys

CHICAGO, March 31 /PRNewswire/ -- As the recession continues to deepen and job cuts accelerate, a rapidly rising number of divorced spouses are requesting changes be made to child support and alimony arrangements. In a recent survey of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (AAML), 39% of the nation's top divorce attorneys cite an increase in modifications being made to child support payments. Additionally, 42% of the members report a rise in the number of changes made to alimony payments. [Emphasis added]

SOURCE American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers (AAML)

Mass Alimony Reform Bill Filed, 72 Legislative Co-Sponsors

Feb-14-2009

Four Alimony Reform bills were filed in the current legislative session. Our bill, which was one of the four, had an outstanding 72 legislative co-sponsors.

Our Bill will be sent to the Joint Committee of the Judiciary for a hearing, at which time we will have the opportunity to be present and testify. Members of MASS ALIMONY REFORM will receive a notice from Steve Hitner as soon as we are notified of the date, time, and location. Members will receive instructions on how to prepare to testify, including the proper procedures for writing and submitting your testimony to the Committee.

Finally, continue to email your state representative and senator to support this bill. Tell your story in an honest, direct, and respectful manner.

Download Mass Alimony Reform Bill 2009 with co-sonsor list

Letter To The Editor, Mass Lawyer's Weekly

‘With just laws, less for couples to fight over’

Nov-24-2008
To the editor: Because of the legalization of gay marriage in Massachusetts, the image of the commonwealth as a land of enlightenment shines brighter than ever. But the state’s archaic alimony laws tell a story of such harsh, pervasive injustice that it’s hard to believe we’re talking about the same place.

[Download the full letter.]

Mass Bar Task force calls for limits on amount, duration of alimony

By: Barbara Rabinovitz, Lawyer's Weekly
Published: November 10, 2008

"A task force seeking standards for “reasonableness” in the amount and duration of alimony has recommended in a draft report that the dollar amount of alimony not be more than 33 percent of the difference between the parties’ incomes.

That income guideline is one of several recommendations contained in a seven-page report by the Joint Massachusetts Bar Association/Boston Bar Association Alimony Task Force, whose mission since its inception a year ago has been to stimulate discussion on how best to foster “consistency and predictability” in alimony awards.

“There has been a lot of concern and confusion about the state of alimony in Massachusetts, raised by a variety of decisions from the appellate courts over the past years,” said task force Co-Chair David H. Lee, a 35-year Boston domestic relations practitioner.

The issues that have proved particularly nettlesome, according to Lee, include duration of alimony, retirement by a supporting spouse and its impact on alimony, and the effect of child support on alimony."

Source: Lawyer's Weekly. The above text is an excerpt from the article. (More news on the joint MBA/BBA task force is shown below.)

Mass Lawyers Offer Alimony Calculator

Nov-10-2008
Massachusetts lawyers Scott R. Stevenson and Justin L. Kelsey provide a first look at the MBA-BBA alimony task force recommendations in their Stevenson-Kelsey Spousal Support Calculator.

[Comment By M.A.R.:The complexity of the law requires lawyers and a calculator, leaving divorcing couples receiving different alimony decisions depending on the personal discretion of each and every judge. Such differing application of the law to the same situation is a violation of the equal protection clause of the United States Constitution (Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1).]

WBUR's Hear and Now Discussion On Alimony Reform

Jul-30-2008
Elizabeth Benedict (writer and author) discusses how the Massachusetts alimony laws put a heavy financial burden on second wives by imposing alimony on them to pay for the lifestyle of their new husband's former spouse. Sally Frank, attorney and law professor at Drake University, also joins us to discuss divorce law. To listen to the discussion, go to Here-and-Now Alimony.

WGBH Discussion on Alimony Reform

Jul-27-2008
Elizabeth Benedict (writer and author), Tim Taylor (drafted reform bill), and Gerald Nissenbaum (divorce attorney) discussed with Emily Rooney, host of WGBH TV's "Greater Boston" show, the "chilling effects of Massachusetts alimony laws". Ms. Rooney commented that Massachusetts divorce laws are "very, very strict... a bit draconian."

WTTK Discussion on Women Canceling Weddings To Divorced Men

Jun-28-2008
Popular radio host Michele McPhee (96.9FM) did a short piece about Elizabeth Benedict's op-ed in the Globe (June 13), and interviewed Ms. Benedict on women who read the op-ed and canceled their weddings to divorced men within hours.

The Huffington Post: Never-Ending Alimony

Jun-16-2008
Elizabeth Benedict (writer and author) wrote an essay for The Huffington Post, "Never-Ending Alimony in Massachusetts".

Mass Lawyer Comments On Chilling Effects Of Alimony Law

Attorney Stephen Ballard wrote in his blog, Jun-14-2008

"The main point that should be taken away from her article, in my opinion, is that the law on alimony is so vague as to permit a huge divergence of results, from one case to another. I would add that these results often depend on factors that should not be important and determinative: they are factors primarily related to the quality and experience of the judge, rather than factors actually relating to the facts of the individual cases"

Boston Globe Op-Ed: Chilling Divorce Laws

Jun-13-2008
Elizabeth Benedict (writer and author) wrote a featured Op-Ed essay in the Boston Globe, "The Chilling Effect of States Divorce Laws".

"Welcome to Massachusetts. In the 1980s, it was known as Taxachusetts. These days, it's known as the state whose divorce laws are so out of date that many people decide against marrying here - or marrying anyone anywhere whose alimony obligations originate here. I'm one of them. Two divorce lawyers tell me that the state's laws are so extreme they have "a chilling effect on marriage." Prenups offer no guarantees. Judges routinely ignore them."

Constitutional Challenge

Jun-12-2008
Ernie and Cathy Ortiz presented their case for the unconstitutionality of lifetime alimony at the John Adams Courthouse, One Pemberton Square, Boston (View court documents.)

Massachusetts' Joint Judiciary Committee Drops Reform

Mar-19-2008
Despite uncontested hearings in support of Massachusetts Alimony Reform and members' letters to the Judiciary Committee, the committee voted to kill reform in 2008 by voting to "study" the bill. We will reintroduce the bill for 2009. Members of the Judiciary Committee may be found at http://www.mass.gov/legis/comm/j19.htm.

Hearing Held at Joint Committee of the Judiciary

Jan-24-2008
Member of the Massachusetts Alimony Reform group and the Second Wives Club testified before the Judiciary Committee on their personal horror stories caused by lifetime alimony, wide disparity and discretion across Massachusetts judges decisions, and curtailment of civil rights for alimony payers and their second wives. The bill the group was supporting was filed by Massachusetts State Representative Stephen LeDuc and was marked House Bill No. 1567.

Massachusetts Men and Women Looking For Alimony Reform

Jan-23-2008
Massachusetts Alimony Reform issued a press release through PRNewswires that was picked up by news organizations across the United States. Just Google the text in the above headline to see a list of the many reprints in such publications as FindLaw, Reuters, and News Blaze.

Massachusetts Bar Recognizes Need For Alimony Reform

Jan-02-2008
"At the 2006 Family Law Conference, our alimony CLE panel identified a need for alimony reform, as alimony awards are not currently either uniform or predictable. The amounts vary widely among judges. Judges currently have only very limited discretion to set the duration of an award. To remedy these deficiencies, the MBA, through President Mark Mason, determined to form a high level alimony study committee in partnership with the Boston Bar Association, the Probate and Family Court and the Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers.

The court has committed two prominent judges to participate on the committee. MBA Vice President Denise Squillante will co-chair, along with an appointee of the BBA. We anticipate that the work of the committee will continue through next year, and that the product will be a white paper to be presented at a symposium and published. This committee will be formally announced at the May 23, 2007 House of Delegates meeting." Source: Massachusetts Bar Association, 2006-07 Year In Review.

Mass Bar and Boston Bar "Debates Future and Fairness of Alimony Awards"

Dec-2007
"The Massachusetts alimony debate centers around “and duration,” two words amending G.L.c. 208 § 34 concerning the apparent breadth of discretion available to the court in fixing alimony orders. The task force hopes to recommend standards for reasonableness of amount and duration."

“It is confusing because the Appellate Court is making decisions based on a case-by-case basis,” said MBA Vice President Denise Squillante, the MBA’s co-chair on the task force. “There is no precedent set. There is a fear from the bench that if they award alimony, it will be forever.”

Source: MBA–BBA task force debates future and fairness of alimony awards, by Kelsey Sadoff, Lawyer's Journal, December, 2007